Acute Resource Divergence
What does this mean?
Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.
The Path Forward
The Realignment
Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | — | — | 42.6% | 11 | Critical Intervention Needed | Decline Risk | |
| 2018 | — | — | 38.9% | 21 | Critical Intervention Needed | Gov Risk | |
| 2017 | — | — | 36.9% | 25 | Critical Intervention Needed | Gov Risk | |
| 2016 | — | — | 21.9% | 33 | Critical Intervention Needed | Recovery | |
| 2015 | — | — | 27.9% | 23 | Critical Intervention Needed | Gov Risk | |
| 2014 | — | — | 23.8% | 33 | Critical Intervention Needed | Gov Risk | |
| 2013 | — | — | 21.6% | 33 | Critical Intervention Needed | Gov Risk | |
| 2012 | — | — | — | 35 | Fragile | Stable Watch | |
| 2011 | — | — | — | 35 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
No IRS 990 Part VII compensation data available for this organization.
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 246 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 42 points below the peer median (0 vs. 42).
5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.
Overall score has gone from 23 → 11 over 5 years (declining by 12 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.
What's driving this score
- Comp-to-revenue ratio of 42.6% is well above the sector's 90th percentile (healthy band: 18–22%).
- Financial resilience score in the bottom quartile — reserves and liabilities ratios warrant review.
What would change this score
The two changes that would most improve this score:
- Reduce top-officer compensation from 42.6% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~40 points.
- Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.