Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
46
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
35
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 46 Fragile Recovery
2022 42 Fragile Recovery
2020 37 Fragile Recovery
2019 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 40 Fragile Recovery
2017 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 0.6% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2015 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 14.3% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 13.4% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 15.3% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KRISTJON IMPERIO Executive Director Hidden
KALLIN JOHNSON Board President
DARRYL CAFFEE ESQ Treasurer
TOM PORTER Board Member
BARBARA GROVES Board Member
LESLIE MCGANN-STURGEON Secretary
GAVIN JONES Board Member
JANAKI MONI Board Member
TOM SAUPE Board Member
PHUC VO Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SARAH SMONGESKI Executive Director Hidden
KALLIN JOHNSON Board President
RANDY BLOOM Board Member
DARRYL CAFFEE ESQ Board Member
MELANIE DONEGAN Board Member
THOMAS INGRASSIA Board Member
SHARON MCLAUGHLIN Board Member
SONIA PAULINO Board Member
BRIAN PERRY Treasurer
TOM PORTER Board Member
ERIN SIMPSON Board Member
RACHEL STRINGER-GRIMSLEY Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
35 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
46 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 245 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).
  2. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.