Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
43
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2023 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 Hidden Hidden 45 Fragile Recovery
2021 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 43 Fragile Recovery
2019 39 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2018 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 51 Fragile Recovery
2015 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 43 Fragile Recovery
2012 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2011 43 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEVE HAHN Board President
ANN MAHONEY Treasurer
DEWITT BROWN Secretary
BEVERLY CLARK Board Member
GAIL DOYLE Board Member
MARCIA DUFFY Board Member
DAVID KASOFF Board Member
CATHERINE KEMPTHORNE Board Member
ROBERTA NEUMAN Board Member
SANDRA SHECKMAN Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEVE HAHN Board President
DAVID KASOFF Treasurer
LESLIE DOWNIE Board Member
MIRIAM S POLLACK Board Member
DEWITT BROWN Secretary
SHARON RICH Board Member
MARCIA DUFFY Board Member
BEVERLY CLARK Board President
GAYLE DOYLE Board Member
MATT SAGAL Board Member
SANDRA SHECKMAN Board Member
CATHARINE KEMPTHORNE Board Member
ROBERTA NEUMAN Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
43 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 245 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 14 points below the peer median (15 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 43 → 43 over 5 years (stable by 0 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.