Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↓
Overall
54
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 7.5% 54 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — 14.8% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 — — 11.8% 52 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 21.4% 45 Fragile Gov Risk
2019 — — 12.1% 52 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — 9.7% 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 — — 9.2% 52 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 — — 2.2% 55 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — 11.1% 56 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 — — 11.9% 56 Fragile Recovery
2013 — — 16.2% 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 — — 13.0% 52 Fragile Recovery
2011 — — 16.1% 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANN ELIZABETH SMITH Executive Director Hidden
CHARLIE WITTENBERG Treasurer —
ELLEN PESCH Secretary —
LISA BROWN LANGLEY Board President —
RICHARD MALONEY Secretary —
DEBORAH ALVES Board President —
DOUGLAS ALLEN Board Member —
JEAN KANARIAN Board President —
JEREMY CRIGLER Board Member —
PERRY PATTERSON Board Member —
GLEN MATTERA Treasurer —
GEORGE DAVIS Board Member —
JOANN FRUCHTMAN Board Member —
VIVIAN BAGUER HOLLAND Board Member —
DONNA JOHNSON Board Member —
KATHERINE PUTNAM Board Member —
MARILYN WORTMAN Board Member —
ANGELA EGERTON Board Member —
BOB AVAKIAN Board Member —
LARISSA BERNAT Board Member —
NANCY CORVESE Board Member —
NINA HOWELL Board Member —
PAUL MAHONEY Board Member —
CHRISTINA BERTSCH Board Member —
SHELLEY CHRISTIANSEN Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANN ELIZABETH SMITH Executive Director Hidden
ANGELA EGERTON Board Member —
BOB AVAKIAN Board Member —
LARISSA BERNAT Board Member —
NANCY CORVESE Board Member —
NINA HOWELL Board Member —
PAUL MAHONEY Board Member —
RICHARD MALONEY Board Member —
SHELLEY CHRISTIANSEN Board Member —
CHARLIE WITTENBERG Treasurer —
ELLEN PESCH Secretary —
LISA BROWN LANGLEY Board President —
PERRY PATTERSON Board President —
DEBORAH ALVES Board Member —
DOUGLAS ALLEN Board Member —
JEAN KANARIAN Board Member —
JEREMY CRIGLER Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANN ELIZABETH SMITH Executive Director Hidden
ANGELA EGERTON Board Member —
BOB AVAKIAN Board Member —
LARISSA BERNAT Board Member —
NANCY CORVESE Board Member —
NINA HOWELL Board Member —
PAUL MAHONEY Board Member —
RICHARD MALONEY Board Member —
SHELLEY CHRISTIANSEN Board Member —
CHARLIE WITTENBERG Treasurer —
ELLEN PESCH Secretary —
LISA BROWN LANGLEY Board President —
PERRY PATTERSON Board President —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANN ELIZABETH SMITH Executive Director Hidden
MARILYN WORTMAN Board President —
MARGO URBANY-JOYCE Treasurer —
NINA HOWELL Secretary —
PERRY PATTERSON Board President —
ANGELA EGERTON Board Member —
BOB AVAKIAN Board Member —
ELLEN PESCH Board Member —
LARISSA BERNAT Board Member —
LISA BROWN LANGLEY Board Member —
PAUL MAHONEY Board Member —
SHELLEY CHRISTIANSEN Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
54 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 222 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.