Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
39
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
45
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 55 Fragile Recovery
2020 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 43 Fragile Recovery
2018 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 47 Financially Distressed Recovery
2015 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 27 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 21 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 21 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LISA GERVAIS Board President
MARIBETH HAGAN Treasurer
PETE OLSON Board President
AMY LOCKWOOD Secretary
MARGIT SURFUS Board Member
COLLEEN FOLSTER Board Member
ALYSSA MAHAN Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LISA GERVAIS Board President
KATHY STEARMAN Treasurer
PETE OLSON Board President
AMY LOCKWOOD Secretary
RICHARD STEARMAN Board Member
BONNIE HOLBROOK Board Member
MARIBETH HAGAN Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
45 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
39 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 246 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 14 points below the peer median (15 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

Overall score has gone from 43 → 39 over 5 years (declining by 4 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.