Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
35
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2023 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 Hidden Hidden 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2021 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 47 Fragile Recovery
2019 18 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 47 Fragile Recovery
2016 43 Financially Distressed Recovery
2015 41 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2014 41 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2013 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 43 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PATRICIA HARCOURT Board President
PAUL SPEER Treasurer
ADRIAN MANN Secretary
SARAH SADLER GENERAL MANAGER
ANDREW WELCH Artistic Director
RUTH HAAS-CASTRO Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
35 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 245 other orgs in MA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 17 points below the peer median (25 vs. 42).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 47 → 35 over 5 years (declining by 12 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.