Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
43
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
35
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 43 Fragile Recovery
2023 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 63 Stable Stable Watch
2020 49 Fragile Recovery
2019 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 51 Fragile Recovery
2011 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Andrea Lanehart Board President
Bridgette Coleman Board President
Kelly Lee Secretary
Linda Gibson Treasurer

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Andrea Lanehart Board President
Shannon Lewy Board President
Linda Gibson Treasurer
Susan White Secretary

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Michele Shaffer Board President
Andrea Laneheart Board President
Kelli Pennington Board President
Linda Gibson Treasurer
Susan White Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
35 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
43 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 3 other orgs in LA with NTEE prefix A1.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 40 points below the peer median (35 vs. 75).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).
  2. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.