Insufficient Data
At least 3 years of filing history are required to project a trajectory.
Insufficient Data
Market
Archetype
Mechanical
Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint
Insufficient Data
What does this mean?
Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Insufficient Data ↓
Overall
40
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
15
Score
Title
-
Institutions
-
Avg Revenue
-
Risk Profile
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Insufficient Data
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2024 | Hidden | Hidden | 20.6% | 40 | Fragile | Gov Risk | |
| 2023 | — | — | — | 49 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2025
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LISA ABUKAMAIL | Secretary | — | ||
| HEATHERCANTINO | Board President | — | ||
| JANICE WRIGHT | Board President | — | ||
| LAURA BENNETT | Treasurer | — | ||
| DIANNE BOUVIER | Board Member | — | ||
| REAGAN KLINGER | NEVISKA DRCTR | — | ||
| SUSAN GILFERT | Board Member | — | ||
| JOY SCHUMACHER | Board Member | — | ||
| ANNA STEVENS | Board Member | — |
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DIANNE BOUVIER | Board President | — | ||
| KATHY KROPF | Board President | — | ||
| HEATHERCANTINO | Board President | — | ||
| CAROL BLYTH | Secretary | — | ||
| LAURA BENNETT | Treasurer | — | ||
| JANICE WRIGHT | SUNSHINE CIRCL | — | ||
| JOY SCHUMACHER | NEWSLETTER | — | ||
| LISA ABUKAMAIL | MEMBERHSIP | — | ||
| SUSAN GILFERT | LIBRARIAN/ARCH | — |
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown
Score breakdown
Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
40 / 100
Priority Review
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 212 other orgs in OH with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: program score sits 15 points below the peer median (15 vs. 30).
5-year trend: Insufficient Data
Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.
What's driving this score
- Comp-to-revenue ratio of 20.6% sits within the sector's healthy band (18–22%).
What would change this score
The two changes that would most improve this score:
- Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.