Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↓
Overall
50
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 8.7% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 — — 6.3% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 — — 6.7% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 — — 5.7% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 — — 6.4% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 — — 6.9% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 — — 7.4% 54 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — 10.2% 47 Fragile Gov Risk
2015 — — 6.4% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 — — 6.9% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 — — 6.6% 54 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — — 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 — — — 52 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RENIA SHTERENBERG Executive Director Hidden
SARAH SMILEY Board Member —
KELLY SCHEETZ Board Member —
KIRSTEN ISMAIL Board Member —
TIM MORIARTY Board Member —
WREN SAUNDERS Board Member —
THOMAS SCHWARTZ Board Member —
BERNEY KUBETZ Board Member —
RICHARD STURGEON Board Member —
NATHAN LESSER Board Member —
MATTHEW DUNLAP Board President —
GREG LAFRANCOIS Board President —
JENNIFER EASTMAN Treasurer —
KAY RAND Secretary —
JUSTIN FOURNIER Board Member —
LARRANCE FINGERHUT Board Member —
KENYA HOPKINS Board Member —
CHUNG SHUM Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BRIAN HINRICHS Executive Director Hidden
ELIZABETH SUTHERLAND Board President —
JENNIFER EASTMAN Treasurer —
KAY RAND Secretary —
THOMAS GOWER Board President —
CHARLES BURGER Board Member —
EDWARD ALLMAN Board Member —
BETH WIEMANN Board Member —
BRIAN WILLIAMS Board Member —
LARRANCE FINGERHUT Board Member —
MATTHEW COBB Board Member —
JENS RUETER Board Member —
BOB CUTLER Board Member —
CAROLINE PHILLIPS Board Member —
MATTHEW DUNLAP Board Member —
RUSS PATTON Board Member —
CONRAD LUMM Board Member —
BEN FOX Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BRIAN HINRICHS Executive Director Hidden
MATTHEW DUNLAP Board Member —
RUSSELL PATTON Board Member —
JENNIFER EASTMAN Board Member —
BETH WIEMANN Board Member —
BRIAN WILLIAMS Board Member —
LARRANCE FINGERHUT Board Member —
MATTHEW COBB Board Member —
CONRAD LUMM Board Member —
JENS RUETER Board Member —
BOB CUTLER Board Member —
NANCY ROWE Board Member —
CAROLINE PHILLIPS Board Member —
ELIZABETH SUTHERLAND Board President —
ERIC STEADMAN Treasurer —
KAY RAND Secretary —
THOMAS GOWER Board President —
CHARLES BURGER Board Member —
EDWARD ALLMAN Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BRIAN HINRICHS Executive Director Hidden
BERNARD KUBETZ Board President —
ERIC STEADMAN Treasurer —
SUE POTVIN Secretary —
TODD BENOIT Board President —
CHRISTINE CUBBERLEY Board Member —
THOMAS GOWER Board Member —
ROBERT HAND Board Member —
RUSSELL PATTON Board Member —
ELIZABETH SUTHERLAND Board Member —
BETH WIEMANN Board Member —
BRIAN WILLIAMS Board Member —
JAMES ADSIT Board Member —
MATTHEW COBB Board Member —
JUDY HORAN Board Member —
JENS RUETER Board Member —
BOB CUTLER Board Member —
TIMOTHY GARRETT Board Member —
CAROLINE PHILLIPS Board Member —
KAY RAND Board Member —
WREN SAUNDERS Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
50 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 67 other orgs in ME with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 26 points above the peer median (60 vs. 34).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.